Yesterday on my daily walk I was on skidrow (which plays pretty nicely with the toy district) looking for a toy to set on fire for an art project. As I waded through the fragrance of piss, pigeons, and people who lived on the sidewalk with matted hair (on accident, not on purpose) I saw this vile disgusting glib thing in a “gallery” window.
I did a project just like this in jr. high and you know mine captured irony more than whatever this is supposed to be is.
Everyone is anti-social promotion except when it has to do with L.A. art and then no one will say anything bad about anyone, because you know “they tried” or they are “community builders.”
Fuck community builders. In art it is just an euphemism for people who “clean up” the neighborhood for business to throw all of the artists and interesting people out.
Do you think Gustav Klimt was a community builder?
Do you think Picasso was a community builder?
Do you think Egon Schiele was a community builder?
Do you think Andy Warhol was a community builder?
Artists aren’t suppose to be nice little networkers that keep suits happy. Artists are supposed to disturb the balance of the community. At least the suit community.
Accountants are community builders. Politicians are community builders. Teachers are who are married to accountants, politicians, and business people are community builders.
In what century did fine artists become community builders?
Artists with any salt are supposed to be narcissistic assholes that burn a trail of destruction wherever they go or at the very least vomit on the host.
Community builder “artists” and "indy" are people who will soon be given their walking papers after everything is nice and clean and safe.
Don’t believe me? Notice what happened to all the indy record stores and bookstores? Remember Midnight Special. It was a cherished member of the Santa Monica community until the community got safe and nice and clean and then it became a blight that needed to be gotten rid of.
Yeah everyone acted sad, but it's gone.
This is LA. Everyone is acting.
Remember when Venice was home to real artists. Not graphic artist who work in film and advertising and did art on the side, but real fine artists. The kind who could actually draw. The city was so happy they were there, because they got rid of crime and added a pleasant element. Then people realized they could get big bucks for the places that those artists were living in and now all of those artists live in Seattle.
You think corporate galleries aren’t coming? They’re coming. Just like corporate bookstores and corporate record shops and corporate coffee came.
The above picture is not art. Not even close. I’m not going to even mention where it was, because my point isn’t to crush people’s dreams or make people feel bad. My point is to simply give people options to read the other side of the coin.
And to put out an argument as to why people in the arts shouldn’t be so fucking pro business all of the time. Have some backbone, because real estate agents, politicians, and all the rest of them don’t give a shit about art.
If you’re an artist, you’re going out. At least have some dignity when it happens. Make them have to repaint the doors and redo the plumbing when they throw your ass out.
Don’t leave, pay them for the full month, though they threw you out in the middle of it. Don’t paint and clean out all of you stuff and then let them fuck your sister.
Business people and politicians care about money. And the people in bed with them who claim to be in the arts don’t care about art, they couldn’t, because you can’t do art if you’re connected to politics (see FoLAR fiasco for more info on that.) You can't do the art that changes the world. You can't do the art that makes people think. There's no way.
Real art picks a side and business and politicians don't have a side, because they might have to switch depending on which side is most beneficial.
People in the arts who you think are your friends and are in bed with politicians what they care about is money. Why should my tax dollars help some "greedy, selfish, doesn’t give a fuck about anyone else and doesn’t care about art and at the end of they day they simply want to make money" jerk.
Nothing is wrong with money or capitalism, but my tax dollars shouldn’t have to finance that. I run my business myself with no grants. You know how? I do things that people like. I know an amazing concept. Produce something that people like and work hard at it. Amazing concept I know.
I hate nonprofit art. I hate it. In LA not only does it attract the “money hungry, but doesn’t want to get a real job” types. It also tends to foster crap.
Nonprofit art is just water to grow the Venus Flytrap of business.
This isn’t Germany or France where people who actually love art get money. It’s LA, where the pleasant kiss asses get all kind of funding and continue to make LA a joke within the art world.
New York has a base of quality, but LA; it doesn’t have that strong of a base to be handing out grants in regards to networking ability. It should be based on the quality of work and that’s obviously not how the money is doled out.
I’m for nonprofit agency for kids, nonprofit agencies for people without houses, nonprofit agency for people to better themselves, but I’m anti-nonprofit for upper middle class circle jerkers who are artless.
People always talk about making your own way. Doing it your way, except when it has to do with welfare for the upper middle class. You know student loans, tax breaks, and grants. It’s odd the same people who tell people to do it themselves always have their fucking hand out for some government money for their vanity projects.
I’m anti my tax dollars going for the above pseudo art. An art program that is directly helping people on skidrow or kids who live in the neighborhood I am completely for, but my money going to help so a suit can realize that they open up another piece of corporate commerce, no, I’m not for that.
________________________________________________________________________
Want to see the how to play with Barbie inappropriately correctly or just curious to see where the above person might have stolen the idea from and then reinterpreted pretty badly? Check out Kari French.
Oh for fun want to see where Murakami might have stole playing with corporate America from. Take a look at Jeff Koons.
You need to acknowledge that Murakami. Andy Warhol, yeah I see that, but you know you’re Jeff Koons doing Andy Warhol.
Murakami’s work is so close to Koons it’s practically plagiarism.
You know people in LA will buy into anything if they get a damn email saying it is cool.
Browne
Recent Comments